A Dialogue from Plato describing quantum physics in 400 bc- just like Nikola Tesla did.
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2019/12/30/a-dialogue-from-plato-describing-quantum-physics-in-400-bc-just-like-nikola-tesla-did/
-Since my own ( 'metaphysical') experiences, and all the information: theories; experiences and most of all; interpretations concerning 'spirituality', I've become quite reluctant, if not ironical towards the use of this multi-interpretable term in daily life and some interpretations I find downright detrimental.
I do agree, or feel that the 'positive' side; compassion; empathy; truth, inner peace, transparency, etc.etc. at all times should be considered as 'intrinsical, natural characteristics', essentially, in most humans.
But if one, or better; referring to myself, apart from what I've observed or 'felt', deduced, around me, is confronted with 'opposite spiritual forces' or 'energy' from someone else (completely opposite to my own 'nature in essence'),
like possessiveness, 'prevalence of 'ego'; ' image', fears, powerplay, inducing pain,etc.etc. and because of this ( on the 'metaphysical level' much more intense, extreme and direct) you 're-act' and 'loose' in some way your 'essential nature',
you can see that 'as long as you feel or are 'violated', by those 'opposed spiritual forces'; are exposed to them, you start to re-act according to these 'negative forces' which is merely a battle and destructive.
As long as you find yourself in the ( luxurious!) position to love, show compassion, be transparent, at peace, 'truthful' etc.etc.: 'spirituality' , or the somewhat 'utopian concept' of it, that is often highlighted, can be constructive, positive, but it is only a part of 'reality' or 'realities'.
( Profound scientific investigation I see as the most objective way of investigating, the most neutral; no subjective values, motives, etc. should be involved, though, e.g. because of o.a. the funding, publications etc. this is in principle impossible).
I do agree, or feel that the 'positive' side; compassion; empathy; truth, inner peace, transparency, etc.etc. at all times should be considered as 'intrinsical, natural characteristics', essentially, in most humans.
But if one, or better; referring to myself, apart from what I've observed or 'felt', deduced, around me, is confronted with 'opposite spiritual forces' or 'energy' from someone else (completely opposite to my own 'nature in essence'),
like possessiveness, 'prevalence of 'ego'; ' image', fears, powerplay, inducing pain,etc.etc. and because of this ( on the 'metaphysical level' much more intense, extreme and direct) you 're-act' and 'loose' in some way your 'essential nature',
you can see that 'as long as you feel or are 'violated', by those 'opposed spiritual forces'; are exposed to them, you start to re-act according to these 'negative forces' which is merely a battle and destructive.
As long as you find yourself in the ( luxurious!) position to love, show compassion, be transparent, at peace, 'truthful' etc.etc.: 'spirituality' , or the somewhat 'utopian concept' of it, that is often highlighted, can be constructive, positive, but it is only a part of 'reality' or 'realities'.
( Profound scientific investigation I see as the most objective way of investigating, the most neutral; no subjective values, motives, etc. should be involved, though, e.g. because of o.a. the funding, publications etc. this is in principle impossible).
