REPETITIONS
PDF : Written and Compiled by Martin L. Pall, PhD
Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences
Washington State University:
As expected: e.g. Google search the professor, and you will find a.o. how his credentials, insights and knowledge are being criticized, and/or being 'debunked' by the 'experts': just like many others with similar expertise and findings, there must be too much 'at stake', for harmful consequences to be recognized as such by the ones responsable for implementing/activating the technology
pdf:
-5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence
for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field
(EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them-
IN THIS EXCERPT:
NR.7: Produce excessive intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i and excessive calcium signaling.
NOTE!!:
π¦π£ππππππ π πππ₯π’πͺππ©π ππ₯ππ€π¨ππ‘ππππ¦, πͺππ©πππ’π₯π π¦/ππ’π¦π, πππ¨π¦π ππ‘ EFFLUX, π’π₯ π₯πππππ¦π π’π ππππππ¨π ππ’π‘π¦
POSSIBLY CAUSING A.O. ( !) DAMAGE TO THE BRAIN
AND FREQUENCY WEAPONS/ AND E.G.THE LARGELY AMPLIFIED WIRELESS RADIATION INFRASTRUCTURE ETC.ETC. CAN 'DIRECT' OR BEAM ANY NUMBER OF FREQUENCIES
FROM AN ARTICLE BY TURAN ( TIM) RIFAT 1996
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vision_remota/esp_visionremota_8.htm
Link pdf (2018)
https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/EU-EMF2018-6-11US3.pdf
AN EXCERPT FROM THIS PAPER:
5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence
for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field
(EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them
Written and Compiled by Martin L. Pall, PhD
Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences
Washington State University
Address: 638 NE 41st Ave., Portland OR 97232 USA
martin_pall@wsu.edu 503-232-3883 May 17, 2018
Summary:
We know that there is a massive literature, providing a high level of scientific certainty, for each
of eight pathophysiological effects caused by non-thermal microwave frequency EMF exposures.
This is shown in from 12 to 35 reviews on each specific effect, with each review listed in Chapter
1, providing a substantial body of evidence on the existence of each effect. Such EMFs:
1. Attack our nervous systems including our brains leading to widespread
neurological/neuropsychiatric effects and possibly many other effects. This nervous
system attack is of great concern.
2. Attack our endocrine (that is hormonal) systems. In this context, the main things that
make us functionally different from single celled creatures are our nervous system and
our endocrine systems – even a simple planaria worm needs both of these. Thus the
consequences of the disruption of these two regulatory systems is immense, such that it is
a travesty to ignore these findings.
3. Produce oxidative stress and free radical damage, which have central roles in essentially
all chronic diseases.
4. Attack the DNA of our cells, producing single strand and double strand breaks in cellular
DNA and oxidized bases in our cellular DNA. These in turn produce cancer and also
mutations in germ line cells which produce mutations in future generations.
5. Produce elevated levels of apoptosis (programmed cell death), events especially
important in causing both neurodegenerative diseases and infertility.
6. Lower male and female fertility, lower sex hormones, lower libido and increased levels
of spontaneous abortion and, as already stated, attack the DNA in sperm cells.
7. Produce excessive intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i and excessive calcium signaling.
8. Attack the cells of our bodies to cause cancer. Such attacks are thought to act via 15
different mechanisms during cancer causation.
There is also a substantial literature showing that EMFs also cause other effects including life
threatening cardiac effects (Chapter 3). In addition substantial evidence suggests EMF causation
of very early onset dementias, including Alzheimer’s, digital and other types of dementias
(Chapter 3); and there is evidence that EMF exposures in utero and shortly after birth can cause
ADHD and autism (Chapter 5).
Each of these effects is produced via the main mechanism of action of microwave/lower
frequency EMFs, activation of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) (Chapter 2). Each of
them is produced via what are called downstream effects of VGCC activation. It follows from
this that we have a good understanding not only that these effects occur, but also how they can
occur. The extraordinary sensitivity of the VGCC voltage sensor to the forces of the EMFs tells
us that the current safety guidelines allow us to be exposed to EMF levels that are something like
2
7.2 million times too high. That sensitivity is predicted by the physics.
Therefore, the physics
and the biology are each pointing to the same mechanism of action of non-thermal EMFs.
The different effects produced are obviously very deep concerns. They become much deeper and
become existential threats when one considers that several of these effects are both cumulative
and eventually irreversible. There is substantial evidence for the cumulative nature and eventual
irreversibility of the neurological/neuropsychiatric effects, of the reproductive effects, the
mutational DNA effects, the cardiac effects, of some but not other of the hormonal effects
(Chapter 3); any causation of ADHD and autism may add additional concerns (here the
cumulative nature is probably limited to the perinatal period). When we know that sperm counts
have dropped by more than 50% throughout the technologically advanced countries on earth, it is
difficult to avoid the conclusion that the vast majority of the population in those countries is
already substantially impacted. The same conclusion can be made based on the widespread
nature of the neuropsychiatric effects in those countries. Both of those effects will get much
much worse even with no increase in current exposures, due to the cumulative nature and
irreversibility of these effects. I expect we will see crash in human reproduction almost to zero as
happened in the Magras and Xenos mouse study which I estimate to occur within about 5 years,
without any increases in our exposures. Obviously 4G and 5G will make the situation much
worse. Similarly I expect that the deterioration in brain function that we are already seeing will
seal our fate if we fail to act rapidly and vigorously. Our collective brain function may become
completely incapable of dealing with such a mega-crisis situation.
Now it can be argued that some of these may not develop as I expect, although those expectations
are based on the best available evidence. One may even be able to argue this for all of those
expectations. However, when we have substantial risk of multiple existential threats to every
single technologically advanced country on earth, failure to act vigorously means there is a very
high probability of complete destruction of these societies. And the chaos which would
inevitably ensue, in a world that still has nuclear weapons, may well lead to extinction. In the
face of these types or risk, the only reasonable course is to move with great vigor to stop new
exposures and lower current exposures. One can still access the internet, using wired
connections.
And we can lower cell phone tower and cell phone radiation substantially. Smart
meters, if needed, can work via wired connections.
Over 60% of this document (Chapters 5 & 6), is focused on the failures of statements from
SCENIHR, the telecommunications industry, the U.S. FCC and the U.S. FDA to reflect the
science. Their statements repeatedly omit much, often all of the most important science. Their
statements are rife not only with omissions, but also with easily demonstrable falsehoods and
with false logic. These have often occurred at times where we know that they knew better. These
have occurred along with vigorous efforts by the telecommunications industry to corrupt the
science by attacking individual scientists whose only fault is that they have obtained important
findings that the industry does not like. These attacks have occurred along with vigorous efforts
to corrupt two agencies that have important regulatory roles.
There are also possible concerns about individual industry-linked research studies. All wireless
communication devices put out polarized EMFs that carry information via pulsations. Both the
pulsations and the polarization make these EMFs much more biologically active. There are three
other factors that also influence the production of effects. Several industry-linked studies may
have used these factors, along with using very tiny numbers of individual animals in their studies,
to produce studies which may have been designed to fail (Chapter 5). It is not clear at this point
whether this type of concern is quite limited or whether it is very broad.
3
The European Commission has done nothing to protect European citizens from any of these very
serious health hazards and the U.S. FDA, EPA and National Cancer Institute have done nothing
to protect American citizens. The U.S. FCC has been much worse than that, acting vigorously
with wanton disregard for our health.
Preface
The document that follows was, in its original form, sent to many of the authorities of the
European Union, in conjunction with other documents sent to the same people by a group of
European scientists. It was in response two documents that were, in turn, written by Mr. Ryan
and Dr. VinciΕ«nas responding to a large group of European and other international scientists
expressing great concern about the safety of 5G.
I was asked by the leaders of the group of
scientists to write my own response to those two documents. Mr. Ryan made the statement that
“There is consistent evidence presented by national and international bodies (International
Commission on Non Ionising Radiation Protection - ICNIRP, Scientific Committee on Emerging
and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) that exposure to electromagnetic fields does not
represent a health risk, if it remains below the limits set by Council Recommendation
1999/519/EC1.” In fact, that is not either the ICNIRP or SCENIHR position – their position, and
similar positions have been taken by the U.S. FCC, FDA and the National Cancer Institute, is that
the evidence is inconsistent or conflicting and therefore, in their view, no conclusions can be
drawn. Some of these organization have also stated that there is no known mechanism by which
effects can be produced. What is shown below is that there is a vast amount of evidence in the
independent scientific literature that conflicts with both the conclusion about lack of
demonstrated effects and the conclusion about lack of mechanism.
The European Commission, according to the Ryan and VinciΕ«nas documents and the U.S.
National Cancer Institute, according to their web site, are each depending on the SCENIHR 2015
document to make judgments about EMF effects. Consequently, the reliability of SCENIHR
2015 is an essential element in determining the reliability of both of their assessments.
The document that is presented below, differs from the document that was emailed to EU
authorities in three different ways: 1. The original document was sent as an email with multiple
attachments. In this document attachments are simply provided as citations. The current
document is a stand-alone document. 2. Some material is inserted to discuss positions taken by
the U.S. FCC, FDA and National Cancer Institure, so as to be particularly relevant to the U.S.
situation. 3. Substantial additional evidence is also provided.
The revised document contains seven chapters followed by a citation list for the entire document:
Chapter 1: Eight Extremely Well-Documented Effects of Non-Thermal EMF Exposures: Role of
Pulsations, Other Factors that Influence EMF Effects, pp. 4-17
Chapter 2: How Each Such EMF Effect Is Directly Produced via Voltage-Gated Calcium
Channel Activation: Role of the Voltage Sensor in Producing the Extraordinary Sensitivity to
EMF Effects, pp. 17-23
Chapter 3. Strong Evidence for Cumulative and Irreversible EMF Effects pp. 23-27
Chapter4. EMFs Including Wi-Fi May Be Particularly Damaging to Young People pp. 27,28
4
Chapter 5: The Importance of the SCENIHR 2015 Document and the Many Omissions, Flaws
and Falsehoods in That Document pp. 28-58
Chapter 6: The U.S. Early Role in Recognizing Non-Thermal EMF Effects and How This Was
Abandoned Starting in 1986: U.S. Failure to Research Health Impacts of Cell Phone Towers,
Cell Phones, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters and Now 5G. What Is the Current Position of U.S.
Government Agencies? pp. 58-78
Chapter 7: The Great Risks of 5G: What We Know and What We Don’t Know pp. 78-82
etc. etc.
A positive ion is an atom or molecule that has lost one or more electrons due to a high-energy impact. Positive ions are generated by natural forces such as the decay of radioactive minerals, radon gas, forest fires, lightning and ultraviolet rays.
weather fluctuations raised the number of positive ions in the atmosphere. This is turn resulted in a relationship between ions and health being widely recognised within the Japanese scientific community. 
